top of page

Thought attempts at halting our own demise

FEBRUARY xth, 20-xx?

Fun Post

Semi Paper

Professional Research paper

Blog Massacre

Conclusion Analysis Machine

Contains MIND maps of things, organised data,

voting

visual diagrammatic map thing similar to the dream cloud govt. thing.

Mnay other things that I would not really understand (can hire info analysts etc.) and creative* info dudes for how its put together, to be understood.

​

*(plus anal too: vy impt to be well structured)

\

is all just for fun now but cray one day?

<---

​

(its not gonna help having a cray to fix anything. you have goood ideas, and sort them well. Tools do not make the man, but eventually, there may be a lot of people doing the extinction stuff, so it might get interesting. But just data sorted well straight from the start or would never be amplifiable, however never data sorting would ever encroach upon a person, or enforce a changed view from having to be affitted to tickboxes for the IT system. 

 

Also maybe eventually the crays could help.

​

Don't settle for less than good data kept of true meaning of what you were saying, cause shit now a txt file is like a few kb, and I am sure this shit can be dealt with, for keeping intention of mind beyond tickbox for IT system. Surely it can in this day and age with like 4kb files and 1 tb hard drives right.

Rules: Fun posts or semi paper/pro research paper are to be posted first, and will be retained in original order.

"Blog massacre" will not influence your paper post. You may not delete the original off the site, (but if can embarassed can be ticked as hidden), but can do addition posts, to that paper after thinking more about it.

Can completely ignore "blog massacre" if you wish. You can download the transcript also. And "blog massacre" gets recorded all the time.

​

Don't know how the conclusion analysis mind map system will work yet. but its meant to be definite conclusions or autocad layers of conclusions, with lower layers as less possible than the higher, on a mind map point position say. And various other layer systems also, including graphs of even single data points on variant votable layers.

​

Hopefully with the layers system, it can make it easy to sort data also for if it ever did get crayed, but there might be more to it for info analysts than that, prob some code numbers at least, but nothing ever to screw up the meaning of the data in full, and there are sentence analysis programs for coding them now I think too. but some pretty extreme sorting mechanisms for something like this, and many variant outputs, graphical, spreadsheet, all codenumbered, things I am not really up with the play about, but done to a serious organisational level, with even organisational expansion pre written into it, if thats possible. code numbers, I know you can have empty slots on those at least.

​

​

​

Now things don't have to be anal!. And I consider this definitely the newtonian prism and required for "light" in this context. No more social barriers. Hey just make a 3 page document. You don't have to publish it in journals. And you can choose your level. I reckon this freedom feeling from this, means, that we would get more data, without social restriction, (3 levels here of paper-ness, plus whatever in bn is fine)

and it would be a triangle of professionalism essentially here, from the fun post, semi paper, and pro research paper. So just to allow the data in.And for such an important thing, it should be very open without social say publishing things getting in the way for something as serious as the death of humans. It really must be broken to trinary, at least, and with this site, crossovers are ok. But in some senses keeping your mind quantum differential to a blog, is to make a different thought realm entirely, so you could block all, and read the blog massacre transcript if you want. It is hellfire and vengeance when blogging, so, quantum differential mind & private mind not rammed is fine too. But the blog transcript would be there to download, if you want to ensure your mind remains quantum/private, and not bent around so many ways, by people, or things forgotten by you from heavy ramming from blogging, and having to be argumentative. Just whatever. Its freedom by this trinary system of not such a big deal, but also publicity out there but not affected if wish based, or you might be an arguer, and actual want to "ram the social" of telling people who's who. But with my system, you can choose, it can be public, and still can retain your original feeling of the paper or idea, and not worry about animalistic argumentative things perhaps. So its public, and blog massacred maybe, but you still retain retention of your idea. And also will go into any military cray system, for viablility check. A good one. You can be public and yet so private of argumentativeness, and hence retain your ceratin special idea, AND you know def post physics review letters postings, and hey as if there was ever human death event review letters, at all. So. I think this should be opened up.  It's tri with this system, and also, on off for argument blogging, if you think it may hammer the original idea in your mind too much. or you just don't don't like arguments say.Just with this, you can even be public and yet private at the same time.

It certainly has to be done correctly for this sort of thing. And not too much sexual competition for things, out of place, ie, sure you might get laid, but essentially you may have just killed you and the chick/s and all the rest.  On the other hand keeping things in line is impt too. Things must be decided on. But the blog thing is no holds barred, but on the other realm the data of ideas is always backed up anyway, but the layer system keeps it unbiased. Also you might run science bible CAD, for connecting science, and if it doesn't connect, that's prob cause you got new data and dissed someones ass to make them near looking like noone, and suddenly hey hey we need you, then you have to dredge up all the data. so science bible cad might solve it, and for scientific safety also, and can use layers similar to above. Like I myself, I hate debating, for example.

Who the hell wants to show off?. But if there was extinction CAD also from the data for things really really sorted, there certainly would have to be some seriously major showing off for things that MUST happen.

like the SLAM tax, which the military does anyway, in essence.

​

We should think about the death of the human dinosaur, also, and by means it cannot understand, which is the way that 

extinctions occur. The dinosaurs could:

​

A: not understand the meteorite because were not intelligent enough (beyond knowledge)

and 

B: were not prepared for it.

(by use of actual preparatory action)

​

The human dinosaur effect will follow the same rules.

The Human Dinosaur

I have some experience with extinction event thinking. I have tried to contact the future of humanity institute at oxford about a couple of ideas, and the other german one. Also talked to global security institute about many. 300 plus. So I have experience in thinking about it. I have not been shunned, but , actually once, but cavemen restrictors must not do this. It must be recorded not lost.

Its way too dangerous to dump ideas.

Not that they ever said no, but sometimes scientists can get anal, and say no to an idea, and that idea could come true if another parameter of truth changes, in the future. I don't really believe in no's or you are wrongs for such things. I think they should be logged, state parameters of what would need to change for it to be true. and make that a parametric IT red popup thing, or traffic light system. But people would ahve to read through the file to find its limiting parameters, and they have to be data connectable by the program, which can expand more for more "data limiters" But yeh I don't believe in no's. Or this is wrong. I think for this its safer to have it kept and recorded, and to state the data fields for limiters, and ready to do red popups if another truth in science changes. The paraCAD way may be more advanced than debating. Esp if it gets into a cray.

​

One eg.

I wanted the military/govt. to model in wind tunnel the stalk break parameters of various crops, for high winds as climate change gets worse.

yeh from el nino right, not IR loss of energy to the space vaccuum with higher conductance., even sending it off orbit but 0.0001 degrees, but its enough. I am really realistic. Stalk break parameters definitely.

. It still means crop extinction. and at the first stage.  Just from wind. What were you thinking? something later on, or undefined, or nought. Its just to get generic jobs like this done, is a good thing. stalk breaks.

For the space vaccuum E loss, CO2 is used in lasers. but its in and out to space too, and methane is used in lasers too right. so our atmosphere is more lasering of IR and other light f's, possibly altering some test equipment biased and unknown.. radio f's, dunno. probably.  I should be working for the FHI, but they know about this site. 

remember i like everything in the cray for all ideas respected to create a system of popup IF statements. like IF some new data comes along, and that does end up being true of one guys idea from new data comes along, it wasn't deleted by debate slamming. New human evolution could be in the human outsourced social mind in an IF popup cray. Then all data is there.

I love crazy ideas.

"your ass done it"

bottom of page