THE PROJECT

FACT:

TECHNOSOCIALISM

WOULD FREE SOCIETY

WHILE REDUCING FOSSIL

FUEL USE TO 1% SAVING

THE PLANET

    Technosocialism:
    Defined as:
    A socialist like political or communal method of existence whereupon an effective technoutopia is formed by means of the creation of technosocialist utilities. A Technosocialist utility is a work input free and financial outgoings free factory or system designed to produce a good of some sort be it an edible consumable or other useable raw product such as steel, or a manufactured product such as a car. A technosocialist system is thus a method of living or political system, whereby several technosocialist utilities of suitable means to meet required or desired needs and wants are created and used by society to fulfil their requirements. Goods created by the technosocialist utilities in such a system are free to be taken and used by the community at their whim from organised product pickup locations, analogous to supermarkets and storage yards in todays financially based systems.
    There are several possible forms of technosocialism.
    Complete technosocialism taken to the extreme to full technoutopia, whereby all needs and wants are met by technosocialist utilities and in which the passing of money is not required.
    Raw materials trading technosocialism, whereby raw materials only are produced by technosocialist utililties, leaving raw materials to be processed further by society in regular business processes. Work is still undertaken as is the case in a business in a regular economy. Money is used for swapping goods and services. Skilled labour is required, and people work in organised groups or companies to create products traded for financial gain, and to benefit the society and fulfil any required niches.
    Raw materials bartering technosocialism, whereby only raw materials are produced by technosocialist utilities, leaving raw materials to be processed by society in a bartering type business economy, whereby people swap their further processed goods at local fairs for other produced goods. Work is still undertaken but money is not used. Skilled labour is still required and each member of a community gains skills in processing the raw materials with their specific expertise to produce specific products for barter.
    Combined technosocialism, whereby an amalgm of the above three are used to form the most suitable system for the communities variant personality types as well as for general public happiness and societal goal attainment.

PS TECHNOSOCIALISM IS NOT

NECESSARILY THE BIG POLITICAL

HARDCORE THING, BUT COULD

BECOME POLITICS ONE DAY,

BUT IS CERTAINLY NOT TO BE

THOUGHT OF IN TERMS OF

SOMETHING FORCEFUL OR IN

ANY WAY TO BE ASSOCIATED

WITH ANY SOCIALIST DICTATORSHIPPING STUFF,

(IE. PINOCHET ETC. IS NOT THIS)

MY BLOG ABOUT TECHNOSOCIALISM FOR EXAMPLED EXPLANATION

Daniel Jones said...

    Hi, I was the guy that originally typed the word technosocialism into google, though it probably did exist somewhere and it was basically to get technology into political realms.
    Anyway, here is my idea on technosocialism and what it is.
    Here's my original idea:
    Ok so what you do is you have to create a working bee system where the community purchases for example an orange grove, puts treadmills under the trees with factory at the end of the rows. The system does all sort of things, to process the oranges, squirts fermented orange peels under the trees again etc. and leaves you with free juice and bagged oranges at the end for collection. To be a true "technosocialist utility", the factory must work off wind power, ie. uses no power, and has no workers, and has zero outgoings as the third factor, and obviously the orange grove has some mineral and element loss, so part of it is to pump in human sewerage off the sewer pipes.
    So ok that's not the end of it, so then you have free orange juice for the community, perhaps a bottle a week each or one a day even for each family.
    After this, you continue working at your regular job, but on the weekend you go on to the apple orchard next, and in 3 months everyone has free apple juice, cider, apples. A little money might be made from exports of excess product which may be enough to help with building the third factory, which is a bonus, and you might even profit from the investment. As you continue on, you can also gain more and more investment excess regains from exporting these products as well, and the whole system is a hyperbolic thing, removing your daily expenditures eg. on juice, and gaining more from exports.
    So you can also do on site bread, cooked in a wind powered underground friction oven, things like this. and it continues on past food, and into mining, metal smelting, etc. and the near final stage after food, then materials is products from materials such as sheet metal, nuts and bolts etc. and the absolute final stage is to have free cars, everyone has a private jet etc. and yeh you go down to the supermarket, and just get food rather than buy it, or go to the car lot and just take a car you like the design of for the day. So it's logically possibly, and if working on weekends, a fun bbq and some beer after can make the effort feel like a community event much the same as a concert, and a fun project for the community to do together.
    As for the cost of the original purchase etc. of the orange grove, it has to be taxed, and a lot of the things for making it made by eg. the local wood turner, turns pegs for the under-tree treadmills, and the local electronics enthusiast helps with the circuitry wiring and the rest help with carrying things, building and whatever else.
    That's it in a nutshell really, it's nicer, well my personal feelings are that its better than robotics replacing work, and all the problems facing us soon with these problems, and it's just bloody intelligent compared to the personal focus we have towards money, we should rather be focusing together on getting rid of the junk.

United Darwinism Approach

Backup or normal system for technosocialism site:
A suggested amount of money maximum any member might give is 2 thousand dollars say, or some maximum affordable percentage, taken from self taxation basically. They might pay 20 dollars a week from an 800 dollar wage. Not an amount you would ever miss that much or that would in any way financially cripple a member.
The system could work like "Anonymous", with their attitude that they are everyone and noone, hence cannot fail. So this system of multi website connected collections of members, from different countries which if I, the original member/creator was to die/any other, it would be able to be run by any other members, and they organise the money, and the projects. It should run like a leaderless, or changeable teamleaders social system.
It would always be able to continue towards the goals for humanity. The money taken could be run through a trust account and is fully viewable to other members. A clause will remove any member that seeks to use trust assets for personal gain. All assets if ever liquidated, would be put into share invested funds for some form of technologically driven charity slash functional NFP business

And hence, the movement and attitude and actual physical results could never fail and hence then cannot die and there would remain momentum of the system and attitude, with responsibility shared bn any and all members for its success.